
In the opening scene of Wes Anderson's
The Darjeeling Limited, we see an American businessman (Anderson regular Bill Murray) in a taxi, racing through traffic in an unnamed Indian city on his way to the train station. He runs into the station, buys his ticket, and tries to chase down the titular train. As he races down the platform, he's overtaken by Peter Whitman (Adrien Brody), also running for the train. The film slips into one of Anderson's trademark slow motion shots, set to the Kinks' "This Time Tomorrow." Peter catches the train, the businessman does not, and when Peter finally climbs the back of the caboose, he turns to see the other man, still on the platform. It's a lovely bit of filmmaking, and an inspired beginning for the film. Unfortunately, the rest of the movie doesn't live up to it.
The story involves three grown rich-kid brothers- Peter, Francis (Owen Wilson), and Jack (Jason Schwartzman)- taking a so-called "spiritual journey" through India. As Anderson's films are pretty much always about failure, it's no surprise that the boys don't even come close to enlightenment. The most shocking failure of the film is how little weight any of it has. Part of the problem is that none of the characters makes much of an impression. Fully-realized characters have never been one of Anderson's strong points, and that's never been so glaringly apparent as in
Darjeeling.
In his previous films, Anderson has always found room within the story for small, indelible bits of character business that really cements them in our minds- Dignan's 150 year plan, Blume's relationship to his sons, Margot's secret smoking habit, Hennessey's reaction when Steve comes to rescue him. Here there are plenty of character quirks, but none of them feel especially illuminating. They just feel quirky for quirky's sake. Also, I didn't simply make the above list of characters from Anderson's previous films to be a completist- I remembered each and every one off the top of my head. I doubt I'll be able to make the same claim about anyone in
Darjeeling a week from now, with the possible exception of the lovely Rita (aka Sweet Lime), played by Amara Karan.
For years I've defended Anderson's tendency towards whimsy in his films, but I fear that he's lost me this time around.
Darjeeling is a marvel of design, but there's no soul underneath. Everything feels calculated rather than felt. I think the difference between this movie and Anderson's earlier, better films is that this one lacks a grounding character, a principal figure in the story who is somewhat detached from the whimsy. In both
Rushmore and
The Life Aquatic this character was played by Bill Murray, a master of wry melancholy whose very presence provided a rueful commentary on his surroundings. Similarly,
The Royal Tenenbaums had Gene Hackman's Royal, a salty old coot who was literally on the outside looking in, a contrast to the Salingeresque Tenenbaum family proper. I was hoping that the skeptical Peter might turn out to be that character in
Darjeeling, but no dice- despite some initial resistance, even he gets swept up (by rapids, to be precise) into the spirit of the journey. That Adrien Brody gives easily the best performance of the three principals only makes it more unfortunate when the character proves to be something of a non-starter. In the end, it all got to be a little much to bear. (
Happy now, Steve?)
Also, the baggage at the end? Probably not a good idea.
Despite this misstep, I believe Wes Anderson remains a major artist. Unlike
some people, I don't hate
The Darjeeling Limited, but- not to put too fine a point on it- if he wants to truly progress as a filmmaker, he'll need to extract his head from his ass. In the mid-90s, both Wes and another Anderson (Paul Thomas) emerged as important new voices on the cinematic horizon. But while Wes quickly honed a trademark style to the brink of becoming a schtick, P.T. continued to challenge himself in new genres and styles. Wes Anderson has already been anointed the next Scorsese by Scorsese himself, but if he really wants to become twenty years from now what Scorsese is today, he's going to need to step outside his comfort zone sooner rather than later.
Rating: 4 out of 10.