Nowadays,
Hollywood isn’t
known for its ambition. One look at the
box-office charts and it’s easy to see why- of the ten highest-grossing movies
of 2011, only one wasn’t a sequel, and that exception
(Thor), was made with the intention of setting up an imminent
Avengers movie. Faced
with these dire circumstances, it’s easy to wax nostalgic about the 1970s, in
which bold emerging talents created wildly original films in a climate
characterized by creative freedom. And
by “creative freedom,” I mean drugs.
As
evidenced by accounts of Seventies Hollywood such as Easy Riders,
Raging Bulls and The Kid Stays In the Picture, as Tinseltown’s
young Turks made their journey through cinema, drugs regularly rode
shotgun. At a time when seemingly half
of Hollywood
was crashing on Jennifer Salt’s couch while the other half was sleeping with
Warren Beatty, drugs were pretty much everywhere. Many of the decade’s key figures such as
Martin Scorsese, Hal Ashby, and Sam Peckinpah made era-defining films while
under the influence of intoxicating substances of various stripes. If you never heard about “drug problems” back
then, it was because everyone had drugs or could get them, so what was the
problem?
However,
by the time 1978 rolled around, drugs were getting sick of being the silent
partner in Hollywood’s
resurgence. So drugs decided to make
their own movie, throwing a bunch of Beatles songs into a flimsy frame story
and calling it Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. And this being the 1970s, drugs got
ambitious- they didn’t just cast movie stars, no sirree. They also cast loads of rock stars, because
if anyone will jump at the chance to work for drugs, it’s rock stars. Of course, drugs ran into trouble when it
came to those killjoys at the Director’s Guild, who balked at the idea of an
assortment of chemicals, pharmaceuticals and plant derivatives taking work from
flesh-and-blood filmmakers. But while
Michael Schultz took the credit (or the blame, as the case may be) for bringing
Sgt. Pepper to the big screen, this is still essentially a film
by drugs.
But
while drugs played a part in some of the most important and popular works of
the day, in each case there was inevitably a sure creative hand on the wheel,
keeping things moving in a productive direction, usually with a strong vision
in mind. To cite the obvious example,
the album with which this movie shared its title was recorded while the Fab
Four were deep into their drug phase.
Yet because the Beatles- both individually and collectively- were
genius-level musicians, the result was brilliant, sometimes in ways that were
only enhanced by the drugs. However,
drugs alone can’t substitute for talent, and if there’s no vision behind a
project, things get dire pretty quickly.
Ever
listened to someone who’s stoned out of their mind try to tell a story or talk
about something in any depth? That’s
basically what the Sgt. Pepper movie feels like. The governing principle behind this movie
seems to be having the entire cast and crew show up on the set and inhale crazy
amounts of blow and pot, then decide what the hell they were going to do that
day. How else to explain musical numbers
like the one in which Steve Martin (in his first movie) mug-sings “Maxwell’s
Silver Hammer” surrounded by dancers dressed up as Boy Scouts, then
dance-fights with Peter Frampton and the Bee Gees? And why did anybody think it was a good idea
to take Paul McCartney’s melancholy ballad “She’s Leaving Home” and have it
sung partly by leather-clad fembots?
Because drugs, that’s why.
And
I guess it should go without saying that with so much chemical inspiration on
the set, coherence isn’t Sgt. Pepper strong suit. But really, this movie’s story, such as it is,
makes no sense even one a scene-to-scene basis.
For instance, when the band first arrives in California, they have a drug-fueled (duh)
dinner party at the home of record mogul Donald Pleasance. The scene is shot to emphasize its sinister
implications, with freaky camera angles and leering close-ups of Pleasance as
he watches the boys sign with his label.
Clearly we’re supposed to think the boys are signing away their
lives/innocence/firstborn children, right?
But no, everything goes pretty great for them from that point forward. Then there’s the scene in which the band’s
manager plots with his sexy singer girlfriend to steal all the band’s money- as
they sing “You Never Give Me Your Money,” naturally- only to have their crooked
dealings forgotten one scene later.
I
suppose glaring plot holes like these make Sgt. Pepper
amusing and watchable in an terrible sort of way, but that doesn’t mean it’s
any good. It doesn’t help that standing
in for the Beatles- who actually possessed real screen presence and acting
chops, it should be noted- was a quartet of musicians who had no business
top-lining a major studio production. Peter
Frampton fares worst of the bunch as Billy Shears, a happy-go-lucky sort who
enjoys wearing pink outfits and white overalls monogrammed with his name. Frampton shows no signs of acting talent or
big-screen charisma, and he’s forever being upstaged by his hair, which makes
him look like he dumps peroxide on his head regularly. With no clue how to behave onscreen, he
mostly just mugs for the camera, giving the impression that he was called to
the set just after snorting his lunch off the craft services coffee table,
except in his darker moments when he sulks around like a spoiled teenager who’s
just been grounded.
Despite
being the reformed Lonely Hearts Club Band’s lead singer, Frampton invariably
gets shown up by The Bee Gees, who play his band mates the Henderson brothers. Granted, the brothers Gibb can’t act either-
the sole trick in their acting arsenal is to smile widely and strike album
cover poses- but at least they know what to do with a song, and their ability
to conjure up impeccable three-part harmony is pretty impressive.
Most
of the Bee Gees’ bad laughs come courtesy of Barry Gibb’s wardrobe. This being the seventies, exposed chests were
considered the apex of male sexuality, and Barry takes full advantage of this. As my lovely wife put it, “I don’t think
Barry’s shirts button above the navel,” but that’s not entirely accurate. At a funeral scene near the end, as the boys
bear a casket to the tune of “Carry That Weight”– which, come to think, is
still subtler than the soldiers in Across the Universe
carrying the Statue of Liberty while singing “I Want You (She’s So Heavy)”– Barry’s
mourning blouse buttons up to his sternum, which under the circumstances should
be interpreted as a respectful gesture to the deceased. But even during Barry’s more modest moments,
a young George Michael was clearly taking notes.
The
good news is that, even amidst the drugs and the lousy acting and the
unfortunate fashions, there’s always the music to enjoy. And even though the late-seventies setting
necessitated a disco-funk production style (courtesy of former Beatles producer
George Martin, no less!) some of the musical performances hold their own. Earth, Wind and Fire does a Philly soul
version of “Got to Get You Into My Life” that’s pretty good, if slightly marred
by their futuristic tribal wear and some of the singers’ tendencies to pull the
“Africa face,” to quote Get Him to the Greek. And even when onetime Beatles collaborator
Billy Preston shows up at the climax of the film to save the day by flying
around and shooting lightning bolts from his fingers and turn the villains and
random passerby into clergymen (again, because drugs), he still manages to work
in an energetic and decidedly funky take on “Get Back.”
Best
of all is Aerosmith, who drop into the story near the end to deliver their
justly famous rip-roarin’ take on “Come Together.” Now that Steven Tyler has reinvented himself
as everyone’s favorite crazy uncle on American Idol, it’s
nice to see him doing something he’s actually good at, sneering and belting and
sexing up the song. Rocking out, in
other words.
But
as good as Aerosmith’s number is, it’s also indicative of the biggest
(non-drug) problem with the Sgt. Pepper- for a movie that’s
allegedly about rock’n’roll, there’s a decidedly anti-rock bias. What made the Beatles so great an influential
is that they took rock’n’roll and infused it with real artfulness, but in a way
that didn’t make the music any less rockin’.
By contrast, this movie seems designed to placate all the bluehairs in
the audiences who still hated rock music, portraying the titular band as a
quartet of old-school tunesmiths and the real rockers (played by such
luminaries as Aerosmith and an eerily Frank Zappa-esque Alice Cooper) as the
villains.
Consequently,
Sgt. Pepper feels like something of an orphan movie. Anyone who hated rock would have next to no
interest in a Sgt. Pepper movie. Meanwhile, those people who appreciated the
Beatles and what they did for popular culture would find the movie’s take on
the material both square and fairly disrespectful. More than anything, it reminds me of the
classic Mr. Show sketch “Rap: The Musical,” in which
rap-phobic theatergoers were treated to a Cohan-style singin’-and-hoofin’ revue
featuring hip-hop lyrics and subject matter.
Because
the parties responsible for Sgt. Pepper were all about
finding new ways to water down their inspiration, the movie builds to a massive
singalong reprise of the title tune that doubles as an homage to the classic
album cover. Among the ringers producer
Robert Stigwood enlisted for this scene were Tina Turner, Donovan, Sha-na-na,
Keith Carradine, Wolfman Jack, and Carol Channing. Some of the folks who turned Stigwood down
were Elton John, Rock Hudson, and Barry Manilow, which forces us to contemplate
a project that was too ridiculous for the guy who gave the world “Copacabana.”
Also
hiding out in the crowd were Paul and Linda McCartney, as well as George
Harrison, who one year later would form his own production company, Handmade
Films. History tells us that Harrison
started up Handmade to bankroll Monty Python’s Life of
Brian, but I like to think the idea began on the set of Sgt.
Pepper when he looked around and thought, “hell, even
I could do better than this.”
4 comments:
I tried watching this for my own, um, edification a couple of nights ago. Just to see if my memory of it was somehow mistaken. It wasn't. It's a seventies Saturday morning kids' show gone horribly round the bend. I didn't get very far into it, and after I turned it off, I felt the urge to take back all those horrible things I said about Across the Universe.
"essentially a film by drugs"
Hilarious. Great write up Paul! It actually makes me want to see this even though I've sworn off all movie watching, post-S. DARKO.
To enjoy this movie, I think you have to watch with someone else with whom you can get a banter going. Although I was making wise-cracks through the entire film, the after-effect was a pleasent one. As a Beatles fan AND a Bee Gees fan (I can't say Frampton really came alive for me,) I enjoyed seeing how the later artists interpreted the Lennon-McCartney compositions. I felt the Bee Gees may have been fans of the Beatles music and wanted to do the songs justice. Overall, if you can get over the dim and unconvincing expressions on the musician's faces and Frampton's collection of pink shirts, in the words of George Burns (Mr. Kite) a fun time will be guarenteed for all!"
Any movie with a carnival scene that includes sexy ballerina mimes and two guys rollerskating in a horse suit deserves to watched at least once, but if you're a Frankie Howerd fan and are contemplating seeing it out of respect for him, look for "Up Pompeii" videos instead. Still . . . how about Alice Cooper's death match with . . . a pie? (Spoiler alert: THE PIE WINS! :-D)
Post a Comment